WebHensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433, 103 S.Ct. 1933 (1983). The Court explained that the burden is on the prevailing party to establish the hours and rate claimed: “The party seeking an award of fees should submit evidence supporting the hours worked and rates claimed. WebHensley, 461 U.S. at 435 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). However, “[m]uch of counsel’s time will be devoted generally to the litigation as a whole, making it difficult to …
United States Court of Appeals
WebId., (quoting Hensley, 461 U.S. at 433). “In addition, an attorney’s work on unsuccessful claims not related to the claims on which the attorney succeeded is not compensable, because such work ‘cannot be deemed to have been expended in pursuit of the ultimate result achieved.’” McKenna v. WebEckerhart, No. 81-1244. C. Duane HENSLEY et al., Petitioners v. Thomas ECKERHART et al. v. No. 81-1244. Argued Nov. 3, 1982. Decided May 16, 1983. Syllabus. Respondents, on behalf of all persons involuntarily confined in the forensic unit of a Missouri state hospital, brought suit in Federal District Court against petitioner hospital officials ... hockey in austria
Jane L. v. Bangerter, 61 F.3d 1505 Casetext Search
WebHensley, 461 U.S. at 435. Use of a mathematical approach comparing the total number of issues with those prevailed upon to determine a reasonable fee is improper; the court should assess whether the relief justified the expenditure of attorney time. Id. at 435 n.11. Excellent results normally Webin Hensley: Much of counsel’s time will be devoted generally to the litigation as a whole, making it difficult to divide the hours expended on a claim-by-claim basis. Such a lawsuit … WebIn such a suit, even where the [461 U.S. 424, 435] claims are brought against the same defendants - often an institution and its officers, as in this case - counsel's work on one … htc r33084